![]() It was so successful that it completely revitalized Sony’s seemingly defunct plans for a Spider-Man cinematic universe. Venom (Fleischer, 2018) may not have been good, but it was wildly successful. How could a Venom film be good or successful if it is cut off from its parent character? It was a bit baffling when Sony Pictures moved ahead with a solo Venom film, given that the character’s origin is inextricably linked to Spider-Man in the comics. It also prevented Spider-Man from appearing in films based on ancillary Spider-Man-related material from the comics. This allowed Spider-Man to appear in MCU films and MCU characters to appear in solo Spider-Man films. The final nail in the coffin seemed to occur when Sony negotiated a deal to share the cinematic rights to Spider-Man with Marvel Studios. To that end, they dusted off their abandoned Venom project.īut the next Spider-Man film, The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (Webb, 2014), was a disaster, scuttling shared universe plans before they even began. Sony hoped to copy this success by building a cinematic universe around Spider-Man. Marvel Studios had made five loosely connected films leading up to the huge team-up film, which proved greater than the sum of its parts. That film was a relative success, but more importantly, that same summer, the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) reached enormous success with the release of The Avengers (Whedon, 2012). They developed it for several years until it was decided that the Spider-Man series would be rebooted with The Amazing Spider-Man (Webb, 2012). Even though the character and film were poorly received, Sony Pictures and the producers were adamant about spinning off a solo Venom film. The character of Eddie Brock/Venom first appeared on film in Spider-Man 3 (Raimi, 2007).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |